Pink Flower

Industry

Industry

Enterprise SaaS

Enterprise SaaS

Role

Role

Product Designer

Product Designer

Team

Team

Content Engineer

Timeline

Timeline

3 months (2024)

3 months (2024)

Challenge

Cisco Meraki enterprise customers had to choose between legacy and subscription licensing at renewal, a high-stakes decision most weren't prepared to make. The product surfaced the choice but didn't explain it. Documentation existed, but wasn't engaging enough to help users understand licensing concepts at the moment of decision.

Results

The pilot established in-product learning as a viable adoption lever, informed a new departmental initiative, and contributed to ~4k additional monthly active users.

8%

in subscription adoption

in subscription adoption

71%

completion rate (~21k launches)

completion rate (~21k launches)

Discovery

Identifying the opportunity through internal outreach

I identified a gap in how our enablement supported product adoption and pitched in-product learning to leadership.

Once approved, I surfaced subscription licensing as the strongest first test case: high stakes, complex concepts, and a clear decision moment where context was missing.

Constraints

No playbook, no established relationships

Our team had few existing relationships with product teams at Cisco, so building visibility and buy-in to source multiple opportunities happened in parallel with designing and shipping.

Design decisions

Interactions that reduce complexity at the point of decision

  1. Narrowing down essential concepts

    Beyond benefits and video examples, users needed to interact with the concepts that actually drove subscription value. I narrowed the focus to three:


  1. Prototyping logic before visuals

    Licensing logic was complex enough that I prototyped interactions before honing visual design. This confirmed feasibility early and prevented wasted effort on directions that couldn't be built.


  1. Separating concepts without implying dependencies

    Showing all concepts at once created cognitive load with no clear starting point. A step-by-step structure implied the concepts were dependencies in the actual licensing process, which they weren't.

    I separated them into focused interactions within an FAQ format, matching how users naturally sought to understand new concepts while letting them interact with each one immediately.

Impact

A pilot that outlasted its scope

The pilot established in-product learning as a viable adoption lever and informed a broader departmental initiative.

From there, the approach expanded. Other opportunities like Management Mode and AI Assistant were identified and handed off to teammates to build. Within a year, the initiative had grown to more than four additional opportunities beyond the original pilot.

Learnings

Account for platform dependencies before you build

The learning content was fully built and ready, but launch depended on engineering prioritizing the link and notification context. I'd map platform dependencies earlier, treating them as design constraints from the start rather than a handoff problem at the end.